Shamate Urban Rebellion: Class, Identity, Resistance & the Hukou Divide

May 22, 2025

The Shamate subculture, emerging in early 2000s China, served as a rebellious expression of rural migrant youth resisting urban marginalization. Mostly rooted in extravagant fashion and digital engagement, the Shamate embodied defiance against the socio-economic hierarchy reinforced by China’s Hukou system. While Hukou reforms facilitate rural-to-urban migration, they failed to dismantle structural inequalities, leaving migrants in precarious labor conditions. Shamate, framed as ‘low-class’ by urban discourse, illustrates the persistence of the urban-rural divide and the exclusionary nature of China’s industrial modernization. Through aesthetic rebellion, digital subversion, and class struggle, Shamate’s trajectory reveals insights into youth resistance, labor exploitation, and the controlled liberalization of China’s social landscape. This article sheds light on the intersection of class, identity, and policy-driven marginalization in contemporary China.

Poster Design By Louise Renée Eringaard

Introduction

In the early 2000s, a subculture emerged on the margins of China’s urban landscape: Shamate (杀马特). Characterized by towering and colorful hairstyles, heavy makeup, and flamboyant fashion inspired by Japanese Visual Kei and Western emo culture, Shamate quickly became a distinct identity among China’s rural migrant youth. More than just an aesthetic movement, it represented a response to deep-seated social inequalities, particularly the challenges faced by young rural workers adapting to urban life. Shamate faced widespread ridicule, revealing the enduring urban-rural divide in contemporary China (Huang, 2021). The rise and decline of Shamate is closely tied to China’s socio-economic transformations, particularly the relaxation of the Hukou system, which historically restricted rural-to-urban migration and access to urban benefits. While Hukou reforms have facilitated greater mobility, they have not fully erased the structural barriers that limit rural migrants’ integration into city life (Grey, 2008). Moreover, digital culture has the power to further reinforce these divisions, as online discourse often positioned Shamate as an object of mockery rather than solidarity (Huang, 2021). Despite its decline, the Shamate subculture remains a significant case study for examining the intersections of migration, identity, and social change in China. Its trajectory not only reflects the evolving experiences of rural migrants but also highlights the ways in which policy reforms shape cultural expression and class distinctions. To better understand these dynamics, the research question that this paper asks is: How does the Shamate subculture reflect China’s socio-economic transformations, particularly in relation to Hukou relaxation?

This article will begin by examining the Shamate subculture as a form of cultural resistance. It will then explore the impact of Hukou reforms on rural migrants, highlighting persistent inequalities. Next, it will discuss how class struggle, labor exploitation, and digital marginalization shaped Shamate’s rise and decline. Finally, it will conclude by reflecting on Shamate’s significance in understanding youth resistance, the urban-rural divide, and state control in modern China.

Shamate & Urban-Rural Divide

The subcultural identity of Shamate was not just about fashion but also a form of social resistance. Shamate rejected mainstream urban aesthetics, middle-class consumerism, and the exclusionary parts of China’s urban spaces. Despite its grassroots origins, Shamate was quickly ridiculed by urban netizens and dismissed as ‘tasteless’ or ‘low-class’, reflecting the deep-rooted urban-rural divide in China’s cultural landscape during the time. As mentioned previously, the internet played a crucial role in amplifying this divide, with urban-based social media users mocking Shamate members for their perceived failure to assimilate into dominant urban culture (Huang, 2021). This ridicule was not merely lighthearted, but was embedded in digital discourse shaped primarily by young white-collar workers and university graduates. These users used platforms like QQ (a Chinese instant messaging and social networking platform) and online forums to assert cultural dominance through satire and mockery. For example, Shamate were frequently ridiculed for their exaggerated hairstyles and cheap clothing, described in online commentaries as ‘incompatible with bright office buildings and luxurious shopping malls’. Rather than serving as an equalizing space, the digital sphere functioned as a mechanism of social sorting (Huang, 2021). At the heart of the struggles Shamate’s faced lies China’s Hukou system, a household registration policy that has historically structured social stratification. Instituted in the 1950s, the Hukou system was designed to control population mobility. To do so, the system would categorize individuals as either rural or urban residents. Rural residents were tied to their agricultural Hukou, restricting their access to urban resources such as education, healthcare, and social welfare benefits (Grey, 2008). This contributed greatly to a rigid divide between those born into urban privilege and the rural population, who, despite migrating to cities in large numbers, remained economically and socially marginalized.

Since the economic reforms of the late 20th century, the Hukou system has undergone several rounds of relaxation, which has allowed greater mobility for rural migrants. In recent decades, state policies have focused on rural development by funding agricultural modernization, public services, resettlement, vocational training, and job creation (Ahlers & Schubert, 2013). More recent reforms have made it easier for migrants to obtain urban Hukou in smaller cities, yet major metropolitan areas still impose strict barriers, limiting access to full urban citizenship (Grey, 2008). Even as rural migrants contribute to urban economies, they often remain in precarious, low-wage labor, unable to fully integrate into city life. While the Hukou system was introduced in the 1950s, the emergence of Shamate in the early 2000s coincided with China’s continued industrial expansion and market reform that began in the late 20th century, particularly following Deng Xiaoping’s policies in the 1980s that encouraged rural-to-urban migration. Millions of rural workers left their hometowns to seek employment in urban factories (Grey, 2008). While this migration was essential for industrial growth, it did not translate into upward mobility for most rural youth. A system initially designed to maintain a socialist rural-urban divide, evolved into a mechanism of exclusion under state capitalism. Shamate are discursively framed as underprivileged, lacking education and skills, which positions them as ‘hopeless’ in the eyes of urban citizens. In their perceived failure to meet societal urban standards, their exaggerated hairstyles, inexpensive clothing, and imitation-brand cellphones become paradoxically visible in Chinese internet discourse, acknowledged precisely through their exclusion (Huang, 2021).

Alex Huanfa Cheng, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Class Struggle, Reforms & Youth Movements

From a Marxist perspective, the economic disenfranchisement of migrant workers in China aligns with the concept of class struggle. Migrant workers, primarily from rural backgrounds, form a sub-proletariat that experiences exploitation under capitalist expansion, mirroring Marx’s predictions about industrial labor under capitalism (Pun, 2022). The rise of the Shamate subculture can be seen as a form of cultural resistance, wherein disillusioned youth, alienated from urban prosperity yet unable to return to rural traditions, construct their own identity through exaggerated aesthetics and anti-mainstream values. Different types of policies attempted to address rural inequalities, but in practice, local implementation varied significantly, reinforcing stratification instead of reducing it. Rural development is often selective, benefiting model villages while leaving many areas unchanged (Ahlers & Schubert, 2013). These discrepancies deepened socio-economic disparities, which further drove the youth’s migration to cities and contributed to their alienation. While China’s working class faces structural divisions, moments of collective identity formation such as shared grievances over low wages, labor exploitation, and exclusion can create new forms of working-class consciousness (Pun, 2022). Youth movements have historically served as a reflection of socio-political change, exemplified by the state-backed Red Guards of the 1960s, mobilized under Moaist doctrine. Their activism was driven by political education, factional rivalries, and an idealized vision of revolution (Xu, 2010). Unlike the Red Guards, the Shamate movement emerged as a bottom-up rebellion rather than a state-directed mobilization. This contrast underscores a fundamental shift in China’s socio-political landscape, whereas youth movements during the Mao era were often driven by ideological fervor and state-sponsored revolutionary discourse, contemporary subcultures like Shamate arise in response to economic and industrial pressures. The decline of ideological engagement and the rise of economic stratification reflect a broader transition from a politically mobilized society, to one shaped primarily by market forces and industrialization policies.

The Hukou reforms over the past decades illustrate both continuity and change in China’s approach to migration control. The hierarchical exclusions surrounding the Hukou system are not accidental but embedded in China’s labor system. Migrant workers are systematically disenfranchised through employment precarity and lack of legal protections. This fragmentation of the workforce, specifically between urban hukou holders and rural migrant laborers, reinforces capitalist control by preventing broader class-based solidarity (Pun, 2022). This suggests that the marginalized Shamate youth embody an implicit critique of capitalist inequalities, reflecting broader patterns of youth resistance within China’s evolving labor landscape. The government’s push for authoritarian legality using selective legal reforms to maintain social control demonstrates how policy changes do not necessarily lead to systemic transformation but rather to controlled liberalization with political oversight (Kellogg, 2018). Since Xi Jinping took office, legal reforms have ‘advanced at a snail’s pace,’ with little effort to improve judicial independence or strengthen national and local legislatures In some cases, protections for workers have even been weakened (Kellogg, 2018). This suggests that rather than moving toward a rule-of-law state, even in a limited authoritarian form, China is retreating further into a system of discretionary control where laws serve the Party’s political goals rather than providing any stable legal guarantees, greatly influencing marginalized groups.

Conclusion

To conclude, the Shamate subculture highlights the struggles of rural migrant youth in urban China and serves as a reflection of the country’s socio-economic transformations. Unlike past movements, such as Maoist-era youth mobilization driven by ideology, Shamate emerged as a bottom-up cultural resistance in response to increasing rural-urban migration. While Hukou relaxation allowed greater mobility, it did not eliminate structural barriers to full urban integration, leaving many migrant workers in precarious labor conditions and socially marginalized. The Shamate subculture embodied this exclusion, as its members used aesthetic rebellion to navigate their controversial status. Additionally, digital culture eventually reinforced their marginalization, accelerating their decline and reflecting the persistence of class distinctions despite economic modernization. Though Shamate has faded over the years, its legacy underscores how China’s shifting policies continue to shape the opportunities, identities, and resistance of rural migrants in an increasingly controlled, market-oriented society.

Editor: Pawel Ostern

Copy Editor: Ellen Anderson

Chief Editor: Anahita Poursafir

Reference

Ahlers, A. L., & Schubert, G. (2013). Strategic modelling: “Building a new socialist

countryside” in three Chinese counties. China Quarterly, 216, 831–849.

Grey, W. (2008). Migrant education in Beijing: Hukou and the future of human capital development. Conference Papers – Western Political Science Association, 1, 1–23.

Huang, Y. (2021). Who are the “grassroots”? On the ambivalent class orientation of online wordplay in China. Popular Communication, 19(4), 266–280.

Kellogg, T. (2018). Rule of law in Asia: The case of China. In C. May & A. Winchester

(Eds.), Handbook on the Rule of Law (pp. 490–508). Edward Elgar.

Pun, N. (2022). Marx’s theories and beyond: Understanding working-class solidarity in China. Critical Sociology, 48(7/8), 1237–1252.

Xu, L. (2010). From revolutionary rebels to a thinking generation: A reflection on China’s Red Guard movement of the mid-1960s. Sixties, 3(2), 143–162.

Louise Renée Eringaard

Hi everyone! I’m Louise. I’m originally from the Netherlands and am half Dutch, half Taiwanese. My interests include dark art, alternative subcultures, progressive metal, and women’s rights. I spend much of my free time painting, gaming, and exploring East Asian media and digital culture, particularly where gender intersects in these realms. I earned my Bachelor of Arts in Chinese Studies from Leiden University, studied at NCCU in Taipei for one semester, and am currently pursuing my master’s in Asian Studies at Lund University.